Due to their advantages and relatively advanced technological maturity, SIBs are considered a reliable complement to LIBs, though they will not replace them in the long term.
A recently published study by a research team from Fraunhofer FFB, the University of Münster, ETH Zurich, and Stanford University found that battery technologies build upon one another to a large extent. There are significant knowledge flows within and between LIB and SIB battery technologies. These technological interdependencies are based on shared knowledge pathways regarding material concepts, cell architectures, and production processes. These knowledge transfers can be observed at both the product and process levels, underscoring the interdependence of manufacturing and design knowledge across chemical battery technologies. According to the researchers, knowledge already accumulated from LIB technologies thus significantly influences the development of new battery technologies such as SIBs.
A technological restart in the field of SIBs without prior knowledge of the design, functionality, and manufacturing of LIBs is thus proving to be significantly more difficult than previously assumed. Established market players have structural advantages over new entrants in the research and production of next-generation batteries due to their experiential knowledge, cross-chemical production and design expertise, and potentially existing infrastructure. This can lead to higher barriers to market entry, as new entrants cannot draw on knowledge accumulated over decades, nor on existing infrastructure and value chains.
It can therefore be concluded that companies and even countries that have not yet been among the leading players in the battery market cannot easily circumvent existing technological path dependencies by focusing directly on »Next Generation«-batteries.
Policy makers, industry, and research should therefore view metal-ion batteries as interdependent technologies rather than as isolated knowledge systems. The focus should be on supporting integrated research and development methods as well as platform capabilities that leverage manufacturing compatibility and existing design expertise across various battery cell types.
Rather than a post-lithium-ion era, what is emerging is a phase of technological coexistence and mutual development.